Essay: Theories about Religion

This erectvass discusses theories about religion. All 3 theories, Family Lifecycle hypothesis, the social learning surmise and cultural broadening theory were used to explain the patterns of private spirituality and church involvement. from each star of them is explaining the s\n\nSee alike\n\n try on: Use of Swirls on Web Pages\n tailvass: The most(prenominal) common manner of infection of AIDS\nEssay: psychological Help\nEssay: The supposition of Brand Equity\nEssay: Shortfalls of Varner Company\n\nTheories of Religion Essay Questions\n\nWink vs. Twitch theoretical account Gilbert Ryle shaped a method referred to as midst interpretation. In order to explain this method, Ryle presented the physical exercise of a split second versus a riff in which he explains the difference between one and the other. A fine explanation would ne to see a wink and a twitch as only contractions f the eyelids. A thick definition would be to see the purpose, intention, and cultura lly accepted mean(a)ing of a wink.\n\nHow does it illustrate the importance of thick description? Thick description is important be motion it is impossible to find a culture without perspicacious the culture just as it is impossible to wink without cognise how or what constitutes as a wink. The point is, culture dismiss add meaning to gestures which substructure only be ruling by knowing facets of that culture.\n\nHow does it call into question our ability to create universal theories? You cannot liken cardinal cultures because they both contract their eyelids, you moldiness comp atomic number 18 them by the wink because the thin description can be misleading and thin descriptions cannot be stretched out to cod to many cases.\n\nWhat do we mean when we say Myth is endlessly True when it is false? concord to Livingston, the historical accuracy of a novel has nothing to do with its validity. Myths are trustd to be authoritative and dogmati! c by many. By putting aside the unbelieving and scientific anti-mythical views, and underlying faithfulness can be found, cosmos a profound trueness which cant be explained in base terms. It must(prenominal) instead be explained by myth or other tools such as paradox and metaphors. Truth is relative, not absolute.\n\nProvide an example of a myth. Explain how its True. In Hellenic mythology, Narcissus evokes the wrath of the Gods, who curse him to frame enamored with his own expression which led him to starvation and emaciation. He resolved to put the distressful boy in the outset who was really himself, out of his wretchedness and killed himself. The profound Truth of this myth is that narcissism and pride can be self-harmful and even detrimental.\n\nIs weber an inversion of Marx? Why or Why not? If weber were an inversion of Marx, then weber would say that culture influences economy, exactly not vice versa. weber does not s ay this though. He believes that economy, culture, and all of the aspects that past theorists squander reduced religion fling off to are all billet of a complex relationship, ever effecting each other.\n\nHow does Eliades accession compare? If anyone is an inversion of Marx, it is Eliade. To him, culture is the cause of everything and is the independent variable.\n\nDescribe the If I were a horse approach The If I were a horse approach is based on the idea that theorists have interpret religion with jibe and assumptions. It is wrong to assume that because you and a primitive are both valet, that you can accurately sympathize and sympathize with them and accurately gibe what you would do in their situation. Evans-Pritchard believes that you must critically study and understand the culture. However, critics have said that his sleep together is not with their approach, but with their methods and theories.\n 7362;\n match to Eliade, how does the antiquated man ! view history? According to Eliade, the archaic people want to terminate history. Most archaic cultures believed in a terror of history, or some event that they are ashamed of They also believe in a clock time of purity, usually the point of creation, and assay to return to that purity through ritual.\n\nWhat changed with Judeo-Christianity? In Judeo-Christianity, history is taboo because of the interactions with God rather than profane.\n\nWhat is deplorable about this pause? Eliade worries that because of this counselling on sacred and human interaction, people will gravel to reject the sacred and shift to secularism and atheism.