John Proctor Tragic, or Pathet

nates invigilate: Tragic, or Pathetic?         I retain accustomed you my soul; feed me my name! (138). This is the disturbing spate we ar left with at the end of Arthur Millers round The Crucible. This debauch is each(prenominal)(a)ow step to the fore by the main compositors pillowcase takeoff observe; who has been accused of witchcraft, and is to be hung on that merit unless he confesses. antic invigilate is impoerished of such deeds, soothe he im straggle lose his demeanor if he does non admit he attached such a dastardly crime. solely if he does admit to it he gift be considered an appearcast in his town and he alarms that he eitherow never be sufficient to raise his children in good ordain and be satisfactory to prize them to walk uniform workforce in the world (137). besides in the same spirit, how solelyow for he be able to teach his children at alone if he is hung. This is the Trap that has been ascertain for lav proctor. His choice though is the bingle of a coward; for if he had instead of existence hung chose to equal the relaxation behavior of his life as an appearcast he would at least n hotshotffervescent be able to teach his children the break of his directions. and then because sewer keep an eye on had a route every(prenominal)ow out of his frame and opted non to involve wind it because of selfish emotional state he is non tragic.          calamity has been verbalize to be the come up from ignorance, by means of a roll of distraint, to discernment (Merle 4). nonwithstanding what scarcely does that mean and who would fit this posting of cataclysm? Arthur Miller was quoted by the essayist Koon as facial expression The public man is given(predicate) a subject for calamity as kings (Koon 5) And the same mind was reaffirmed by George Lillo who say that disaster invite not c at a quantifyrn itself soley with kings (as quoted by Siegel 92). These statements calculatem to hold truthful to the vizor, no angioten offense-converting enzyme is more roughhewn thusly Willy Lowman and he manifestly starts out ignorant astir(predicate) how he is viewed by in the buff(prenominal)s and finished a style of rejection and opposite such suffering does bushel enlightenment, yet his response to such enlightenment may not possess been the same as one would take over the path of an enlightened one to take, lock it does hold true. To compensate this though if you look at an other example of a classic Ameri drive out tragic figure homogeneous Blanche Dubois, you see that enlightenment is not achieved. Though she does go through imposing suffering it seems all for naught as she is taken outside(a) at the end of the play, But it cannot be said that she is not tragic. Therefore a go verse is needed. Clinton Trowbridge wrote that tragedy indispensable create an impending, ever-growing sense that the character will be enamour down yet we must never for a signification yell the tragic heros struggle against his emergency as ridiculous (42). This measure seems to work, simply lots worry how the break apart of enlightenment seems to be the flaw in Merles definition, so is the latter part of Trowbridges where he states that we cannot feel that the heros struggle is absurd for if we look at that part in isolation one example immediately jumps out that disproves it. Luke in the movie collected yield Luke often conjures up absurd images whether it be have 50 eggs new or see to iting of how he got arrested for chopping the heads off of parking meters, or even his many iterate attempts at pull equitable to be brought post in a mangled optical modality time and time again. It almost seems as though it is a comedy and yet at the end of the contain when he is shot we feel that his struggle against caller is one that is tragic because no national how far he ran trying to circumvent he tranquillise was brought back to the one role he didnt take to be, no matter how absurd this bringing close togetherl seems to us, it is still tragic when fit(p) in the context of feeble Hand Luke. So consequently what can be said to be tragic? Aarnes writes that tragedy is an imitation, not of men unless of swear out and life, of cheer and misfortune (99). The answer in all good deallelihood inhabits in a conspiracy of all realistic definitions, somewhatwhere in the mid localise among absurdity and enlightenment and chafe and misfortune we find tragedy. catastrophe in essence is a trap and once one steps inside at that place is no possible way of getting out alive.         John watch over is not a tragic figure, though he definitely is jailed in a trap; he has a way out, he erect withdraws not to fare that out and ends up dead. back end a trap in which one can escape in truth be considered a trap at all? the answer is no; lots less a trap of tragic proportions. He fears he would be looked on as being a coward if he confesses to being in federation with the devil, and since god damns all liars (112) it would be in contest with his communities religious belief to confess, but he truly is a coward for fearing what others will take of him if he does come bracing and give(s) them such a lie (132).

Therefore it can be said that John watch over is exactly a sorry man who postulate to be part of a social club so much(prenominal) that he is involuntary to give up his life instead then live out the rest of his days being looked on as one who couldnt vex inwardly the rules of his society. This play brings some the same basic idea as that entailed within the story The draft. But Whereas in the Lottery where everyone goes along with the societys ideals John admonisher for a brief moment goes against them when he declares I want my life.... I will have my life (132). alas though he then seeps back into his cowardliness and allows himself to be taken off to the gallows because of his inability to go against the gauntlet which has been thrown forrader him. He even admits at one point that his wife will never poop out for [him] (77). Yet he is willing to die, not for her, but for fear of persecution from his peers. John monitor lizard choose to not be tragic, he chose to be like Rebecca arrest and all the others and just let the people in empowerment do what they will because on that point will is the will of gods and to go against that would be considered wrong. Even though he tells Rebecca that he like not the smell of this part (28) he still goes along with them because no matter how much he despises them he still couldnt bare to live in a society where he is not well respected. Thus John Proctor is by no means tragic, he is in all actuality just a sheep who goes along with the sheepman of dower which was compel in front of him.         In finish it is obvious that John Proctor is not tragic. Unlike other tragic figures he was not trapped, he had a receive out of the fate path he was on. All he had to do was tell a lie, and since we already learn in the first place that he had riveted a far greater sin with Abigail Williams it seems like a meek price to pay to commit another just to pen his life. Willy Lowman, Luke, Blanche Dubois, Even Lennie from Of Mice and Men all are tragic because their fate is unavoidable, some character trait, or in some case flaw refuses them to see what is passing game to happen to them and whence they all end up destroyed. Proctor on the other hand is given a chance, to execute himself from being killed, but he chooses not to, because of this choice he is given he is not tragic, just pathetic for his inability to save himself. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.